Ever wondered what a deserted London might look like? Like 28 Days but with everyone gone? This could be what it looks like…… and it’s damned unnerving.
Source: Video: Empty London | Londonist
Ever wondered what a deserted London might look like? Like 28 Days but with everyone gone? This could be what it looks like…… and it’s damned unnerving.
Source: Video: Empty London | Londonist
健毅 黃 was out running. He tracked 3.53 km in 20m:41s.
http://app.endomondo.com/workouts/845740092/2918479
Returning back to running after a period of being unable to breathe properly due to a cough. Still lingering slightly, but doesn’t now wake me up at 1am for a coughing fit.
Averaged 5:52 min/km so still within my 6min mark. Running with a Spotify Running list at 160bpm. Finding that’s letting me go slow, but not burn out too quickly.
Technology still has a way to go it seems.
I remember when trying to get back into Heathrow from Germany – and the automatic barriers wouldn’t let me in because I was wearing glasses :/
New Zealand man of Asian origin has “no hard feelings” after passport system said eyes were closed.
Source: New Zealander says passport photo rejection ‘not racist’ – BBC News
Absolutely…. damn… true…
A lot of projects are corporate, but some, like NTP are small, or even solo projects. When these small projects become really important and still not have enough resource to maintain, the security issues can’t be patches as fast as, say Oracle, Microsoft or Google.
Everyone benefits from Network Time Protocol, but the project struggles to pay its sole maintainer or fund its various initiatives
健毅 黃 was out running. He tracked 2.78 km in 15m:06s.
http://app.endomondo.com/workouts/832739985/2918479
Nice short run, just trying to get my form and pace back before increasing distance.
Well… “stealing”? I guess it depends on how you interpret the GPL. Nonetheless bottom line is — if you are going to use GPL code, your code and product must follow the same license. i.e.
“… if you’re going to embed GPL stuff in your code and produce a derivative product, you’re going to have to make that derivative compliant with GPL—either by shipping the code with it or providing the code on request”
So, the headline of “stealing” GPL code? Can you actually “steal” code that is open source? Using open source in a closed source product would be a violation of the GPL (which I believe is what’s being talked about here), but is that “stealing”?
I’m not siding with either side here, I’m just not sure the word “stealing” is the right phrase to use in this headling here, quoted or not. Guess that’s clickbait for you….
Source: Wix gets caught “stealing” GPL code from WordPress | Ars Technica
You must be logged in to post a comment.