New Ubuntu Quirks

So, I install Ubuntu 17 clean on my laptop after the issues I had with drivers and immediately found out that gksu was not installed.

Installed that and tried to

gksudo nautilus

That failed and found out that Wayland had replaced the default of Xorg. Found an old Xauthority file from my backups and copied that back, which allowed me to get the popup window back for my gksu, but I couldn’t click it to enter the password 😦

Then I found this article:

Which tells me I need to use the admin:/// file prefix instead to open something up as admin. Guess I’ll give it a go later.

Upgrading Ubuntu (fun! ¬_¬)

Spent several hours trying to upgrade my Ubuntu installation from 15 up to the latest 17. The upgrade didn’t fail, but I did see a few error messages, and now I have applications failing to start for various reasons, including the settings applet; and when I install or use my nvidia drivers, ubuntu doesn’t start up properly until I do

apt-get purge nvidia*

But removing all the nvidia stuff causes it to fallback to nouveau which for the most part works, but not exactly good for any linux gaming.

Looks like it’s going to be a full-reinstall job to make sure everything is clean 😦

Tunnelling to Kubernetes Nodes & Pods via a Bastion

A quick note to remind myself (and other people) how to tunnel to a node (or pod) in Kubernetes via the bastion server

rm ~/.ssh/known_hosts #Needed if you keep scaling the bastion up/down


ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o ProxyCommand='ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -W %h:%p admin@bastion.{cluster-domain}' admin@$DEST

Run like this:

bash ./ NODE_IP


bash ./ #Assuming is the node you want to connect to.

You can extend this by using this to ssh into a pod, assuming the pod has an SSH server on it.

BASTION=bastion.${cluster domain name}

ssh -o ProxyCommand="ssh -W %h:%p admin@$BASTION" admin@$NODE ssh -tto StrictHostKeyChecking=no $PODUSER@localhost -p $NODEPORT

So if you have service listening on port 32000 on node that expects a login user of "poduser", you would do this:

bash ./ 32000 poduser

If you have to pass a password you can install sshpass on the node, then use that (be aware of security risk though – this is not an ideal solution)

ssh -o ProxyCommand="ssh -W %h:%p admin@$BASTION" admin@$NODE sshpass -p ${password} ssh -tto StrictHostKeyChecking=no $PODUSER@localhost -p $NODEPORT

Caveat though — you will have to make sure that your node security group allows your bastion security group to talk to the nodes on the additional ports. By default, the only port that the bastions are able to talk to the node security groups on is SSH (22) only.

How to using S3 as a RWM/NFS-like store in Kubernetes

Let’s assume you have an application that runs happily on its own and is stateless. No problem. You deploy it onto Kubernetes and it works fine. You kill the pod and it respins, happily continuing where it left off.

Let’s add three replicas to the group. That also is fine, since its stateless.

Let’s now change that so that the application is now stateful and requires storage of where it is in between runs. So you pre-provision a disk using EBS and hook that up into the pods, and convert the deployment to a stateful set. Great, it still works fine. All three will pick up where they left off.

Now, what if we wanted to share the same state between the replicas?

For example, what if these three replicas were frontend boxes to a website? Having three different disks is a bad idea unless you can guarantee they will all have the same content. Even if you can, there’s guaranteed to be a case where one or more of the boxes will be either behind or ahead of the other boxes, and consequently have a case where one or more of the boxes will serve the wrong version of content.

There are several options for shared storage, NFS is the most logical but requires you to pre-provision a disk that will be used and also to either have an NFS server outside the cluster or create an NFS pod within the cluster. Also, you will likely over-provision your disk here (100GB when you only need 20GB for example)

Another alternative is EFS, which is Amazon’s NFS storage, where you mount an NFS and only pay for the amount of storage you use. However, even when creating a filesystem in a public subnet, you get a private IP which is useless if you are not DirectConnected into the VPC.

Another option is S3, but how do you use that short of using “s3 sync” repeatedly?

One answer is through the use of s3fs and sshfs

We use s3fs to mount the bucket into a pod (or pods), then we can use those mounts via sshfs as an NFS-like configuration.

The downside to this setup is the fact it will be slower than locally mounted disks.

So here’s the yaml for the s3fs pods (change values within {…} where applicable) — details at Docker Hub here:

(and yes, I could convert the environment variables into secrets and reference those, and I might do a follow up article for that)

kind: Deployment
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
  name: s3fs
  namespace: default
    k8s-app: s3fs
  annotations: {}
  replicas: 1
      k8s-app: s3fs
      name: s3fs
        k8s-app: s3fs
      - name: s3fs
        image: blenderfox/s3fs
        - name: S3_BUCKET
          value: {...}
        - name: S3_REGION
          value: {...}
        - name: AWSACCESSKEYID
          value: {...}
          value: {...}
        - name: REMOTEKEY
          value: {...}
          value: {...}
        resources: {}
        imagePullPolicy: Always
          privileged: true
      restartPolicy: Always
      terminationGracePeriodSeconds: 30
      dnsPolicy: ClusterFirst
      securityContext: {}
      schedulerName: default-scheduler
    type: RollingUpdate
      maxUnavailable: 25%
      maxSurge: 25%
  revisionHistoryLimit: 10
  progressDeadlineSeconds: 600
kind: Service
apiVersion: v1
  name: s3-service
  annotations: {hostnamehere} "3600"
    name: s3-service
  - protocol: TCP
    name: ssh
    port: 22
    targetPort: 22
    k8s-app: s3fs
  type: LoadBalancer
  sessionAffinity: None
  externalTrafficPolicy: Cluster

This will create a service and a pod

If you have external DNS enabled, the hostname will be added to Route 53.

SSH into the service and verify you can access the bucket mount

ssh bucketuser@dns-name ls -l /mnt/bucket/

(This should give you the listing of the bucket and also should have user:group set on the directory as “bucketuser”)

You should also be able to rsync into the bucket using this

rsync -rvhP /source/path bucketuser@dns-name:/mnt/bucket/

Or sshfs using a similar method

sshfs bucketuser@dns-name:/mnt/bucket/ /path/to/local/mountpoint

Edit the connection timeout annotation if needed

Now, if you set up a pod that has three replicas and all three sshfs to the same service, you essentially have an NFS-like storage.


%d bloggers like this: