With the NSA spying scandal, all eyes are on ways to stop the surveillance and protect privacy. Campaigns such as Reset the Net have been used to encourage and push sites and people to amp up their security methods. Disasters such as Heartbleed shows what happens if security is compromised, whether intentionally or accidentally

I used to use TrueCrypt to allocate a virtual hard disk and put my private files in that. One of the benefits of this was that TrueCrypt also supported full disk encryption and Plausible Deniability (e.g. hiding an OS within another OS). However, one of the most frustrating parts of TrueCrypt is that you allocate space and any space you do not use is lost. e.g. if you allocate 10GB, but use only 1GB, there is still 9GB left that allocated to the TrueCrypt volume, but cannot be used by the unencrypted space.

Unfortunately, I recently found out that TrueCrypt shut down, under very suspicious and mysterious circumstances. (check the related articles section below). Sure, you could use LUKS instead, or VeraCrypt (but I haven’t tried VeraCrypt), but considering I only want to encrypt a subset of my files, and not the whole partition, that might be a little overkill.

So, I investigated the ecryptfs. Details can be found on the Wikipedia page, but in short, it allows you to mount directories (it comes with a wrapper to the mount command), but unlike other mount wrappers, you are allowed to mount on top of the same directory. In other words, you can do:

sudo mount.ecryptfs ~/SecuredData ~/SecuredData

And this will take the data stored in the directory and transparently decrypt it when you try to access the directory.

If you copy data into the directory, ecrypt will encrypt it and store it in the underlying directory in an encrypted manner. When you unmount the directory, only the encrypted data is visible. If you combine the mounting process with the optional Filename Encryption, then all you see are files with garbled filenames.

ecrypt supports various encryption methods, from AES and Blowfish, to 3DES and Twofish. Obviously, the higher you choose the encryption level, the slower the access. 3DES encryption resulted in a transfer rate of 7MB/s for me, when copying to the encrypted space, and AES was 16MB/s, so balance your requirement of high encryption vs slow access.

Related articles

• Encryption Tool TrueCrypt Shuts Down Mysteriously, Encouraging to Use Bitlocker
• List of TrueCrypt encryption alternatives
• Here’s what you need to know about the sudden and mysterious death of TrueCrypt
• Could VeraCrypt become the next TrueCrypt?
• Open Source Crypto TrueCrypt Disappears With Suspicious Cloud Of Mystery
• In Baffling Move, TrueCrypt Open-Source Crypto Project Shuts Down
• Suspicious TrueCrypt Announcement Declares The Tool Insecure, Development Stopped
• TrueCrypt Too Proprietary to be Secure and Corporate Media Should Stop Blaming Free/Open Source Software (FOSS)
• TrueCrypt: How Did the Worldś Most Trusted Encryption Software Just Vanish?
• The life and untimely demise of TrueCrypt