The Rancher guys have put out an intro training video of Kubernetes on Rancher 2.0 – give it a check if you have time. :)

youtu.be/vfV6CehbN…

Decided to try my interval training run on Fitbit. Ended up walking during the recovery jogs instead of jogging.

It’s been a while since I did any decent runs, and today being a good sunny day I decided to go for it.

And shocked by how bad I was :(

I was following Fitbit’s workout which was 2x 12 minute jogs separated by a 90 min rest, then a 3 minute run at the end with a cooldown at the end of the workout. I stopped several times during the runs which annoyed me.

Got the two 12 minute runs down but didn’t do the three minute run at the end.

So, I install Ubuntu 17 clean on my laptop after the issues I had with drivers and immediately found out that gksu was not installed.

Installed that and tried to

gksudo nautilus

That failed and found out that Wayland had replaced the default of Xorg. Found an old Xauthority file from my backups and copied that back, which allowed me to get the popup window back for my gksu, but I couldn’t click it to enter the password :(

Then I found this article:

https://www.linuxuprising.com/2018/04/gksu-removed-from-ubuntu-heres.html

Which tells me I need to use the admin:/// file prefix instead to open something up as admin. Guess I’ll give it a go later.

Spent several hours trying to upgrade my Ubuntu installation from 15 up to the latest 17. The upgrade didn’t fail, but I did see a few error messages, and now I have applications failing to start for various reasons, including the settings applet; and when I install or use my nvidia drivers, ubuntu doesn’t start up properly until I do

[code]

apt-get purge nvidia*

[/code]

But removing all the nvidia stuff causes it to fallback to nouveau which for the most part works, but not exactly good for any linux gaming.

Looks like it’s going to be a full-reinstall job to make sure everything is clean :(

There’s a thought experiment known as Theseus’s paradox (and a couple of variants) and it goes something like this.

If you have a raft and replace the oars and planks due to them rotting or being old, or similar, to such a level that the entire raft is eventually replaced, is it still the same ship?

If you inherited an axe from your uncle and you replace the axe head because it’s blunt, and then the wooden handle because it broke – is that axe still the same one you inherited? Can you still call it your uncle’s axe?

Similarly, if all parts of a computer program are replaced by patches/hotfixes (not as full releases), is it still the same program? Can you, for example, call Microsoft Excel V1 a V1 if every part of it has been replaced with new code through patches and hotfixes? Can you even call it Microsoft Excel?

This is not going to end well….

(Source: www.commitstrip.com/en/2018/0…)

A quick note to remind myself (and other people) how to tunnel to a node (or pod) in Kubernetes via the bastion server

[code lang=text] rm ~/.ssh/known_hosts #Needed if you keep scaling the bastion up/down

BASTION=bastion.{cluster-domain} DEST=$1

ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o ProxyCommand=‘ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -W %h:%p admin@bastion.{cluster-domain}’ admin@$DEST [/code]

Run like this:

[code lang=text] bash ./tunnelK8s.sh NODE_IP [/code]

Example:

[code lang=text] bash ./tunnelK8s.sh 10.10.10.100 #Assuming 10.10.10.100 is the node you want to connect to. [/code]

You can extend this by using this to ssh into a pod, assuming the pod has an SSH server on it.

[code lang=text] BASTION=bastion.${cluster domain name} NODE=$1 NODEPORT=$2 PODUSER=$3

ssh -o ProxyCommand=“ssh -W %h:%p admin@$BASTION” admin@$NODE ssh -tto StrictHostKeyChecking=no $PODUSER@localhost -p $NODEPORT [/code]

So if you have service listening on port 32000 on node 10.10.10.100 that expects a login user of “poduser”, you would do this:

[code lang=text] bash ./tunnelPod.sh 10.10.10.100 32000 poduser [/code]

If you have to pass a password you can install sshpass on the node, then use that (be aware of security risk though - this is not an ideal solution)

[code lang=text] ssh -o ProxyCommand=“ssh -W %h:%p admin@$BASTION” admin@$NODE sshpass -p ${password} ssh -tto StrictHostKeyChecking=no $PODUSER@localhost -p $NODEPORT [/code]

Caveat though – you will have to make sure that your node security group allows your bastion security group to talk to the nodes on the additional ports. By default, the only port that the bastions are able to talk to the node security groups on is SSH (22) only.

Facebook have been having a lot of bad publicity lately (and I would personally say it’s long overdue) and a lot of it over privacy. Now, there’s talk about Facebook lifting SMS and phone call information from Android phones with consent. Yes, Facebook asks for it, but you can (and should) refuse it access.

Later versions of Android allow you to revoke and change the permissions given to an app, and also prompt you again if the app asks for it.

My Facebook app has very little permissions on my device because I don’t trust it a single bit.

I also have Privacy Guard enabled and restricted. Whenever it wants to know my location, I can refuse it.

The London Tube map is iconic and TED has a talk about it.

www.ted.com/talks/mic…

Set your goals.

Break your limits.

Because you never know just how far you can go, unless you can’t see the end.

www.youtube.com/watch

After being out of training for a long while due to illness, I decided to fork out on Fitbit Coach and start using some of their workouts.

Today I decided to go out and try their walking workouts – an audio-driven workout around power walking

Saddened to hear about Stephen Hawking this morning.

While some may not agree with him on certain things, few can dispute his genius.

And the film of his life with Eddie Redmayne is an absolute blast.

youtu.be/KRa_Qps9N…

SONOMA, Calif., March 6, 2018 – Open Source Leadership Summit – The Cloud Native Computing Foundation® (CNCF®), which sustains and integrates open source technologies like Kubernetes® and Prometheus™, today announced that Kubernetes is the first project to graduate. To move from incubation to graduate, projects must demonstrate thriving adoption, a documented, structured governance process, and a strong commitment to community success and inclusivity.

www.cncf.io/announcem…

Great news :) shows that Kubernetes is now considered more mature than previously and it definitely shows.

Let’s assume you have an application that runs happily on its own and is stateless. No problem. You deploy it onto Kubernetes and it works fine. You kill the pod and it respins, happily continuing where it left off.

Let’s add three replicas to the group. That also is fine, since its stateless.

Let’s now change that so that the application is now stateful and requires storage of where it is in between runs. So you pre-provision a disk using EBS and hook that up into the pods, and convert the deployment to a stateful set. Great, it still works fine. All three will pick up where they left off.

Now, what if we wanted to share the same state between the replicas?

For example, what if these three replicas were frontend boxes to a website? Having three different disks is a bad idea unless you can guarantee they will all have the same content. Even if you can, there’s guaranteed to be a case where one or more of the boxes will be either behind or ahead of the other boxes, and consequently have a case where one or more of the boxes will serve the wrong version of content.

There are several options for shared storage, NFS is the most logical but requires you to pre-provision a disk that will be used and also to either have an NFS server outside the cluster or create an NFS pod within the cluster. Also, you will likely over-provision your disk here (100GB when you only need 20GB for example)

Another alternative is EFS, which is Amazon’s NFS storage, where you mount an NFS and only pay for the amount of storage you use. However, even when creating a filesystem in a public subnet, you get a private IP which is useless if you are not DirectConnected into the VPC.

Another option is S3, but how do you use that short of using “s3 sync” repeatedly?

One answer is through the use of s3fs and sshfs

We use s3fs to mount the bucket into a pod (or pods), then we can use those mounts via sshfs as an NFS-like configuration.

The downside to this setup is the fact it will be slower than locally mounted disks.

So here’s the yaml for the s3fs pods (change values within {…} where applicable) – details at Docker Hub here: https://hub.docker.com/r/blenderfox/s3fs/

(and yes, I could convert the environment variables into secrets and reference those, and I might do a follow up article for that)

[code]

kind: Deployment apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1 metadata: name: s3fs namespace: default labels: k8s-app: s3fs annotations: {} spec: replicas: 1 selector: matchLabels: k8s-app: s3fs template: metadata: name: s3fs labels: k8s-app: s3fs spec: containers: - name: s3fs image: blenderfox/s3fs env: - name: S3_BUCKET value: {…} - name: S3_REGION value: {…} - name: AWSACCESSKEYID value: {…} - name: AWSSECRETACCESSKEY value: {…} - name: REMOTEKEY value: {…} - name: BUCKETUSERPASSWORD value: {…} resources: {} imagePullPolicy: Always securityContext: privileged: true restartPolicy: Always terminationGracePeriodSeconds: 30 dnsPolicy: ClusterFirst securityContext: {} schedulerName: default-scheduler strategy: type: RollingUpdate rollingUpdate: maxUnavailable: 25% maxSurge: 25% revisionHistoryLimit: 10 progressDeadlineSeconds: 600

kind: Service apiVersion: v1 metadata: name: s3-service annotations: external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/hostname: {hostnamehere} service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-connection-idle-timeout: “3600” labels: name: s3-service spec: ports:

• protocol: TCP name: ssh port: 22 targetPort: 22 selector: k8s-app: s3fs type: LoadBalancer sessionAffinity: None externalTrafficPolicy: Cluster

[/code]

This will create a service and a pod

If you have external DNS enabled, the hostname will be added to Route 53.

SSH into the service and verify you can access the bucket mount

[code] ssh bucketuser@dns-name ls -l /mnt/bucket/ [/code]

(This should give you the listing of the bucket and also should have user:group set on the directory as “bucketuser”)

You should also be able to rsync into the bucket using this

[code] rsync -rvhP /source/path bucketuser@dns-name:/mnt/bucket/ [/code]

Or sshfs using a similar method

[code]

sshfs bucketuser@dns-name:/mnt/bucket/ /path/to/local/mountpoint

[/code]

Edit the connection timeout annotation if needed

Now, if you set up a pod that has three replicas and all three sshfs to the same service, you essentially have an NFS-like storage.

Redid the last Week 9 run and made it through two intervals and just shy of the third.

Whilst finding vulnerabilities is a bad thing, having them found by white hat hackers is a good thing. Hackathons like this one prove that it can be constructive to get a group of them in to find and help fix vulnerabilities in your system before they are found in public and exploited to death before you have a chance to fix them.

The US Air Force's second security hackathon has paid dividends... both for the military and the people finding holes in its defenses. HackerOne has revealed the results of the Hack the Air Force 2.0 challenge from the end of 2017, and it led to volunteers discovering 106 vulnerabilities across roughly 300 of the USAF's public websites. Those discoveries proved costly, however. The Air Force paid out a total of $103,883, including $12,500 for one bug -- the most money any federal bounty program has paid to date.

 

www.engadget.com/2018/02/1…

[gallery type=“rectangular” size=“large” ids=“6816,6815,6814”]

Finally finished Week 9. Interval three was a difficult one and my pace went from 5:30min/km to 7:33min/km >_<

Contemplating whether to move onto Week 10 or redo week 9 until I can meet the pace.

Having a master in a Kubernetes cluster is all very well and good, but if that master goes down the entire cluster cannot schedule new work. Pods will continue to run, but new ones cannot be scheduled and any pods that die will not get rescheduled.

Having multiple masters allows for more resiliency and can pick up when one goes down. However, as I found out, setting multi-master was quite problematic. Using the guide here only provided some help so after trashing my own and my company’s test cluster, I have expanded on the linked guide.

First add the subnet details for the new zone into your cluster definition – CIDR, subnet id, and make sure you name it something that you can remember. For simplicity, I called mine eu-west-2c. If you have a definition for utility (and you will if you use a bastion), make sure you have a utility subnet also defined for the new AZ

[code lang=shell] kops edit cluster –state s3://bucket [/code]

Now, create your master instance groups, you need an odd number to enable quorum and avoid split brain (I’m not saying prevent, and there are edge cases where this could be possible even with quorum). I’m going to add west-2b and west-2c. AWS recently introduced the third London AWS zone, so I’m going to use that.

[code lang=shell] kops create instancegroup master-eu-west-2b –subnet eu-west-2b –role Master [/code]

Make this one have a max/min of 1

[code lang=shell] kops create instancegroup master-eu-west-2c –subnet eu-west-2c –role Master [/code]

Make this one have a max/min of 0 (yes, zero) for now

Reference these in your cluster config

[code lang=text] kops edit cluster –state=s3://bucket [/code]

[code lang=text] etcdClusters:

• etcdMembers:
  • instanceGroup: master-eu-west-2a name: a
  • instanceGroup: master-eu-west-2b name: b
  • instanceGroup: master-eu-west-2c name: c name: main
• etcdMembers:
  • instanceGroup: master-eu-west-2a name: a
  • instanceGroup: master-eu-west-2b name: b
  • instanceGroup: master-eu-west-2c name: c name: events [/code]

Start the new master

[code lang=shell] kops update cluster –state s3://bucket –yes [/code]

Find the etcd and etcd-event pods and add them to this script. Change “clustername” to the name of your cluster, then run it. Confirm the member lists include both two members (in my case it would be etc-a and etc-b)

[code lang=shell] ETCPOD=etcd-server-events-ip-10-10-10-226.eu-west-2.compute.internal ETCEVENTSPOD=etcd-server-ip-10-10-10-226.eu-west-2.compute.internal AZ=b CLUSTER=clustername

kubectl –namespace=kube-system exec $ETCPOD – etcdctl member add etcd-$AZ http://etcd-$AZ.internal.$CLUSTER:2380

kubectl –namespace=kube-system exec $ETCEVENTSPOD – etcdctl –endpoint http://127.0.0.1:4002 member add etcd-events-$AZ http://etcd-events-$AZ.internal.$CLUSTER:2381

echo Member Lists kubectl –namespace=kube-system exec $ETCPOD – etcdctl member list

kubectl –namespace=kube-system exec $ETCEVENTSPOD – etcdctl –endpoint http://127.0.0.1:4002 member list [/code]

(NOTE: the cluster will break at this point due to the missing second cluster member)

Wait for the master to show as initialised. Find the instance id of the master and put it into this script. Change the AWSSWITCHES to match any switches you need to provide to the awscli. For me, I specify my profile and region

The script will run and output the status of the instance until it shows “ok”

[code lang=shell] AWSSWITCHES="–profile personal –region eu-west-2" INSTANCEID=master2instanceid while [ “$(aws $AWSSWITCHES ec2 describe-instance-status –instance-id=$INSTANCEID –output text | grep SYSTEMSTATUS | cut -f 2)” != “ok” ] do sleep 5s aws $AWSSWITCHES ec2 describe-instance-status –instance-id=$INSTANCEID –output text | grep SYSTEMSTATUS | cut -f 2 done aws $AWSSWITCHES ec2 describe-instance-status –instance-id=$INSTANCEID –output text | grep SYSTEMSTATUS | cut -f 2 [/code]

ssh into the new master (or via bastion if needed)

[code lang=shell] sudo -i systemctl stop kubelet systemctl stop protokube [/code]

edit /etc/kubernetes/manifests/etcd.manifest and /etc/kubernetes/manifests/etcd-events.manifest Change the ETCD_INITIAL_CLUSTER_STATE value from new to existing Under ETCD_INITIAL_CLUSTER remove the third master definition

Stop the etcd docker containers

[code lang=shell] docker stop $(docker ps | grep “etcd” | awk ‘{print $1}') [/code]

Run this a few times until you get a docker error saying you need more than one container name There are two volumes mounted under /mnt/master-vol-xxxxxxxx, one contains /var/etcd/data-events/member/ and one contains /var/etcd/data/member/ but it varies because of the id.

[code lang=shell] rm -r /mnt/var/master-vol-xxxxxx/var/etcd/data-events/member/ rm -r /mnt/var/master-vol-xxxxxx/var/etcd/data/member/ [/code]

Now start kubelet

[code lang=shell] systemctl start kubelet [/code]

Wait until the master shows on the validate list then start protokube

[code lang=shell] systemctl start protokube [/code]

Now do the same with the third master

edit the third master ig to make it min/max 1

[code lang=shell] kops edit ig master-eu-west-2c –name=clustername –state s3://bucket [/code]

Add it to the clusters (the etcd pods should still be running)

[code lang=shell] ETCPOD=etcd-server-events-ip-10-10-10-226.eu-west-2.compute.internal ETCEVENTSPOD=etcd-server-ip-10-10-10-226.eu-west-2.compute.internal AZ=c CLUSTER=clustername

kubectl –namespace=kube-system exec $ETCPOD – etcdctl member add etcd-$AZ http://etcd-$AZ.internal.$CLUSTER:2380 kubectl –namespace=kube-system exec $ETCEVENTSPOD – etcdctl –endpoint http://127.0.0.1:4002 member add etcd-events-$AZ http://etcd-events-$AZ.internal.$CLUSTER:2381

echo Member Lists kubectl –namespace=kube-system exec $ETCPOD – etcdctl member list kubectl –namespace=kube-system exec $ETCEVENTSPOD – etcdctl –endpoint http://127.0.0.1:4002 member list

[/code]

Start the third master

[code lang=shell] kops update cluster –name=cluster-name –state=s3://bucket [/code]

Wait for the master to show as initialised. Find the instance id of the master and put it into this script. Change the AWSSWITCHES to match any switches you need to provide to the awscli. For me, I specify my profile and region

The script will run and output the status of the instance until it shows “ok”

[code lang=shell] AWSSWITCHES="–profile personal –region eu-west-2" INSTANCEID=master3instanceid while [ “$(aws $AWSSWITCHES ec2 describe-instance-status –instance-id=$INSTANCEID –output text | grep SYSTEMSTATUS | cut -f 2)” != “ok” ] do sleep 5s aws $AWSSWITCHES ec2 describe-instance-status –instance-id=$INSTANCEID –output text | grep SYSTEMSTATUS | cut -f 2 done aws $AWSSWITCHES ec2 describe-instance-status –instance-id=$INSTANCEID –output text | grep SYSTEMSTATUS | cut -f 2 [/code]

ssh into the new master (or via bastion if needed)

[code lang=shell] sudo -i systemctl stop kubelet systemctl stop protokube [/code]

edit /etc/kubernetes/manifests/etcd.manifest and /etc/kubernetes/manifests/etcd-events.manifest Change the ETCD_INITIAL_CLUSTER_STATE value from new to existing

We DON’T need to remove the third master defintion this time, since this is the third master

Stop the etcd docker containers

[code lang=shell] docker stop $(docker ps | grep “etcd” | awk ‘{print $1}') [/code]

Run this a few times until you get a docker error saying you need more than one container name There are two volumes mounted under /mnt/master-vol-xxxxxxxx, one contains /var/etcd/data-events/member/ and one contains /var/etcd/data/member/ but it varies because of the id.

[code lang=shell] rm -r /mnt/var/master-vol-xxxxxx/var/etcd/data-events/member/ rm -r /mnt/var/master-vol-xxxxxx/var/etcd/data/member/ [/code]

Now start kubelet

[code lang=shell] systemctl start kubelet [/code]

Wait until the master shows on the validate list then start protokube

[code lang=shell] systemctl start protokube [/code]

If the cluster validates, do a full respin

[code lang=shell] kops rolling-update cluster –name clustername –state s3://bucket –force –yes [/code]

Kubernetes is an awesome piece of kit, you can set applications to run within the cluster, make it visible to only apps within the cluster and/or expose it to applications outside of the cluster.

As part of my tinkering, I wanted to setup a Docker Registry to store my own images without having to make them public via docker hub.  Doing this proved a bit more complicated than expected since by default, it requires SSL which requires a certificate to be purchased and installed.

Enter Let’s Encrypt which allows you to get SSL certificates for free; and by using their API, you can set it to regularly renew. Kubernetes has the kube-lego project which allows this regular integration. So here, I’ll go through enabling an application (in this case, it’s a docker registry, but it can be anything).

First, lets ignore the lego project, and set up the application so that it is accessible normally. As mentioned above, this is the docker registry

I’m tying the registry storage to a pv claim, though you can modify this to tie to S3, instead etc.

[code lang=text]

kind: Deployment apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1 metadata: name: registry namespace: default labels: name: registry spec: replicas: 1 selector: matchLabels: name: registry template: metadata: creationTimestamp: labels: name: registry spec: volumes: - name: registry-data persistentVolumeClaim: claimName: registry-data containers: - name: registry image: registry:2 resources: {} volumeMounts: - name: registry-data mountPath: “/var/lib/registry” terminationMessagePath: “/dev/termination-log” terminationMessagePolicy: File imagePullPolicy: Always restartPolicy: Always terminationGracePeriodSeconds: 30 dnsPolicy: ClusterFirst securityContext: {} schedulerName: default-scheduler strategy: type: Recreate

kind: Service apiVersion: v1 metadata: name: registry namespace: default labels: name: registry spec: ports:

• protocol: TCP port: 9000 targetPort: 5000 selector: name: registry type: LoadBalancer sessionAffinity: None externalTrafficPolicy: Cluster

[/code]

Once you’ve applied this, verify your config is correct by ensuring you have an external endpoint for the service (use kubectl describe service registry | grep “LoadBalancer Ingress”). On AWS, this will be an ELB, on other clouds, you might get an IP. If you get an ELB, CNAME a friendly name to it. If you get an IP, create an A record for it. I’m going to use registry.blenderfox.com for this test.

Verify by doing this. Bear in mind it can take a while before DNS records updates so be patient.

host $(SERVICE_DNS)

So if I had set the service to be registry.blenderfox.com, I would do

host registry.blenderfox.com

If done correctly, this should resolve to the ELB then resolve to the ELB IP addresses.

Next, try to tag a docker image of the format registry-host:port/imagename, so, for example, registry.blenderfox.com:9000/my-image.

Next try to push it.

docker push registry.blenderfox.com:9000/my-image

It will fail because it can’t talk over https

docker push registry.blenderfox.com:9000/my-image
The push refers to repository [registry.blenderfox.com:9000/my-image]
Get https://registry.blenderfox.com:9000/v2/: http: server gave HTTP response to HTTPS client

So let’s now fix that.

Now let’s start setting up kube-lego

Checkout the code git clone git@github.com:jetstack/kube-lego.git

cd into the relevant folder cd kube-lego/examples/nginx

Start applying the code base

[code lang=text] kubectl apply -f lego/00-namespace.yaml kubectl apply -f nginx/00-namespace.yaml kubectl apply -f nginx/default-deployment.yaml kubectl apply -f nginx/default-service.yaml [/code]

Open up nginx/configmap.yaml and change the body-size: “64m” line to a bigger value. This is the maximum size you can upload through nginx. You’ll see why this is an important change later.

[code lang=text] kubectl apply -f nginx/configmap.yaml kubectl apply -f nginx/service.yaml kubectl apply -f nginx/deployment.yaml [/code]

Now, look for the external endpoint for the nginx service kubectl describe service nginx -n nginx-ingress | grep “LoadBalancer Ingress”

Look for the value next to LoadBalancer Ingress. On AWS, this will be the ELB address.

CNAME your domain for your service (e.g. registry.blenderfox.com in this example) to that ELB. If you’re not on AWS, this may be an IP, in which case, just create an A record instead.

Open up lego/configmap.yaml and change the email address in there to be the one you want to use to request the certs.

[code lang=text] kubectl apply -f lego/configmap.yaml kubectl apply -f lego/deployment.yaml [/code]

Wait for the DNS to update before proceeding to the next step.

host registry.blenderfox.com

When the DNS is updated, finally create and add an ingress rule for your service:

[code lang=text]

kind: Ingress apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1 metadata: name: registry namespace: default annotations: kubernetes.io/ingress.class: nginx kubernetes.io/tls-acme: ‘true’ spec: tls:

• hosts:
  • registry.blenderfox.com secretName: docker-tls rules:
• host: registry.blenderfox.com http: paths:
  • path: “/” backend: serviceName: registry servicePort: 9000 status: loadBalancer: ingress:
  • {} [/code]

Look add the logs in nginx-ingress/nginx and you’ll see the Let’s Encrypt server come in to validate:

100.124.0.0 - [100.124.0.0] - - [19/Jan/2018:09:50:19 +0000] "GET /.well-known/acme-challenge/[REDACTED] HTTP/1.1" 200 87 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Let's Encrypt validation server; +https://www.letsencrypt.org)" 277 0.044 100.96.0.3:8080 87 0.044 200

And look in the logs on the kube-lego/kube-lego pod and you’ll see the success and saving of the secret

time="2018-01-19T09:49:45Z" level=info msg="requesting certificate for registry.blenderfox.com" context="ingress_tls" name=registry namespace=default 
time="2018-01-19T09:50:21Z" level=info msg="authorization successful" context=acme domain=registry.blenderfox.com 
time="2018-01-19T09:50:47Z" level=info msg="successfully got certificate: domains=[registry.blenderfox.com] url=https://acme-v01.api.letsencrypt.org/acme/cert/[REDACTED]" context=acme 
time="2018-01-19T09:50:47Z" level=info msg="Attempting to create new secret" context=secret name=registry-tls namespace=default 
time="2018-01-19T09:50:47Z" level=info msg="Secret successfully stored" context=secret name=registry-tls namespace=default 

Now let’s do a quick verify:

curl -ILv https://registry.blenderfox.com
...
* Server certificate:
*  subject: CN=registry.blenderfox.com
*  start date: Jan 19 08:50:46 2018 GMT
*  expire date: Apr 19 08:50:46 2018 GMT
*  subjectAltName: host "registry.blenderfox.com" matched cert's "registry.blenderfox.com"
*  issuer: C=US; O=Let's Encrypt; CN=Let's Encrypt Authority X3
*  SSL certificate verify ok.
...

That looks good.

Now let’s re-tag and try to push our image

docker tag registry.blenderfox.com:9000/my-image registry.blenderfox.com/my-image
docker push registry.blenderfox.com/my-image

Note we are not using a port this time as there is now support for SSL.

BOOM! Success.

The tls section indicates the host to request the cert on, and the backend section indicates which backend to pass the request onto. The body-size config is at the nginx level so if you don’t change it, you can only upload a maximum of 64m even if the backend service (docker registry in this case) can support it. I have it set here at “1g” so I can upload 1gb (some docker images can be pretty large)

From the Kubernetes blog, the next version of Kubernetes has been released. And one feature has definitely caught my eye:

Windows Support (beta)

Kubernetes was originally developed for Linux systems, but as our users are realizing the benefits of container orchestration at scale, we are seeing demand for Kubernetes to run Windows workloads. Work to support Windows Server in Kubernetes began in earnest about 12 months ago. SIG-Windows has now promoted this feature to beta status, which means that we can evaluate it for usage.

So users of Windows can now hook up Windows boxes into their cluster. Which leads to an interesting case of mixed-OS clusters. Strictly speaking, that’s already possible now with a mix of Linux distributions able to run Kubernetes.

blog.kubernetes.io/2017/12/k…

Kubernetes confusing you? This is a really nice short video explaining the basic concepts of Kubernetes

www.youtube.com/watch

You are always lectured about making backups of your systems, even more so when you are running archives from a very active mailing list. ^_^

www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/1…

Tried a different route today. Still sore from the hour run yesterday. This new route turns out to be just under 5k, though I’m not sure it’s right, since my Fitbit seemed to lose communication with my phone so didn’t track the route properly. Guess I’ll try again tomorrow maybe.

Still, I got two achievements on the run which was two PRs on segments on the run (which were tracked properly)

youtu.be/FQC29joih…